µÚ11Â¥

Äã˵µÄºÃÏñÊÇÄÇƪÎÄÕ»¹ÊÇpptÀïдµÄ

	µÚ12Â¥

¹Ø×¢±¾ÌåºÏ²¢

	µÚ13Â¥

Mapping Ö»ÊÇ´¦Àí±¾Ìå¼äµÄ¹Øϵ£¬ MergingÊÇÒªºÏ²¢³öÒ»¸ö½á¹û°É£¬¾õµÃmergingÊÇintegrationµÄÒ»Ö÷Òª²¿·Ö¡£ »ý·ÖÔõô»¹Ã»µ½ÄÜ¿´ftpÃÜÂ룿

----------------------------------------------
This world is changing faster than what we can imagine. But the principle has stayed the same for thousands of years and it will last forever.

	µÚ14Â¥

żҲ¿´²»µ½ftpµÄÃÜÂ룬ÓеãÓôÃÆ

	µÚ15Â¥

ÒÔÏÂÊÇÒýÓÃÎ÷÷×ÓÔÚ2007-3-14 10:39:00µÄ·¢ÑÔ£º ±¾ÌåºÏ²¢£¨ontology merging): °Ñ¼¸¸ö±¾Ìå²¢ÔÚÒ»Æð£¬Ïû³ýÖصþµÄºÍ²»Ð­µ÷µÄ²¿·Ö ±¾Ìå´®Áª (ontology aligning)£º°Ñ¼¸¸ö±¾Ìå´®ÔÚÒ»Æ𣬼´½¨Á¢Ï໥֮¼äµÄÓ³É䣬µ«¸÷×ÔÈÔÈ»¶ÀÁ¢¶øÇÒûÓб»¸Ä±ä¡£ ±¾Ì弯³É (ontology integrating): °Ñ¼¸¸ö±¾ÌåÓлúµØ½áºÏÔÚÒ»Æ𣬲úÉúеÄÒ»¸ö±¾Ìå¡£ ºÏ²¢Ó뼯³ÉÓÐʲôÇø±ð£¿

	µÚ16Â¥

ÍÛ.......ÕÒµ½Ñо¿·½ÏòÒ»ÑùµÄºÃ¶àÈËÁË........ ÎÒÒ²¿´ÁËÄǸöPROMTËã·¨.....±È½Ï³éÏó....¶øÇÒËûÊǸö°ë×Ô¶¯ÇÒÕë¶ÔijЩÌرð±¾ÌåºÏ²¢µÄ.. ´ó¼ÒÓÐÎÄÕ»¥Ï๲ÏíһϰÉ..... ÎÒµÄEmail£ºlightyear5235@hotmail.com

	µÚ17Â¥

ÄǾßÌåmergingºÍintegrationʲôÇø±ð£¿

	µÚ18Â¥

The following is the email from Jerome Eujenat: Here are the definitions of the book. This is all what I can say about it: Matching is the process of finding relationships or correspondences between enti- ties of different ontologies. Alignment is a set of correspondences between two or more (in case of multi- ple matching) ontologies (by analogy with molecular sequence alignment). The alignment is the output of the matching process. Correspondence is the relation holding, or supposed to hold according to a partic- ular matching algorithm or individual, between entities of different ontologies. These entities can be as different as classes, individuals, properties or formulas. Some authors use the term mapping instead, however, it will not be used in this sense in this book. Mapping is the oriented, or directed, version of an alignment: it maps the entities of one ontology to at most one entity of another ontology. This complies with the mathematical definition of a mapping instead of that of a general relation. The mathematical definition would in principle require that the mapped object is equal to its image, i.e., that the relation is an equivalence relation. A mapping can be seen as a collection of mapping rules all oriented in the same direction, i.e., from one ontology to the other, and such that the elements of the source ontology appear at most once. Ontology integration is the inclusion in one ontology of another ontology and as- sertions expressing the glue between these ontologies, usually as bridge axioms. The integrated ontology is supposed to contain the knowledge of both initial on- tologies. Contrary to merging, the first ontology is unaltered while the second one is modified.

	µÚ19Â¥

* Ontology Merging: (Pre-Final Definition): Ontology Merging refers to >       producing a single ontology which is a merged version of the original >       ontologies. Often, the original ontologies cover similar or overlapping >       domains.A merged ontology contains the content of both input ontologies: >       so all their consequences should be preserved. Moreover, some more axioms >       can be added expressing the correspondence between terms.Usually ontology >       merging means given several ontologies which are mapped, we want to get >       one centralized ontology.

	µÚ20Â¥

I strongly recommend that you check google, read some papers or project deliverables to understand these definitions.